News
Japan, South Korea Decided To Restart Routine Meetings At Tokyo Summit

(CTN NEWS) – At the Tokyo Summit on Thursday, Japan and South Korea decided to restart routine leader-to-leader meetings and take efforts to settle a trade dispute.
To move past a century of challenging history, the prime minister of Japan described their meeting as a “major step” towards reestablishing the security and economic connections between the two countries.
The conference might alter the northeast Asian region’s strategic landscape.
Due to their shared concerns about a restless North Korea and a more potent China, the two U.S. allies, who have frequently clashed in the past, are attempting to unite.
Hours after a North Korean missile launch and confrontations between Japanese and Chinese vessels in disputed waters.
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and the South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol both emphasised the value of improving relations as they launched the summit.
AUTHORITY REINSTATES SECURITY TIES
The meeting will signal the start of the leaders’ routine visits, which had been put on hiatus for more than ten years, Kishida said in his opening remarks.
In addition to commencing a process of trilateral communication between Japan, South Korea, and China, he said that the nations had also decided to resume defense dialogue and vice-ministerial strategic consultations.
In terms of our bilateral relations, after a long winter, Japan is finally able to welcome the president of South Korea for the first time in 12 years, Kishida said. “Cherry blossoms just started flowering in Tokyo this week,” he added.
Japan-South Korea relations must be strengthened in the current geopolitical environment, the two presidents agreed.
It “has special significance as it tells the people of both countries that South Korea-Japan relations are off to a new beginning after being troubled by different issues,” according to Yoon of the meeting on Thursday.
The two nations, he continued, “are allies that must work on security, economic challenges, and global agendas” because they “share the same democratic principles.”
Yoon declared, “The ever-increasing threat posed by North Korea’s nuclear missile program poses a major challenge to peace and stability in East Asia and the (broader) worldwide community.
It is important for South Korea and Japan to cooperate closely and stand united against this threat.”
Yoon asserted that South Korea’s and Japan’s interests are not mutually exclusive. Improved bilateral ties would “significantly assist both countries in addressing their security issues.”
According to Yoon, the two leaders expanded their collaboration in areas like security, the economy, and inter-personal interactions.
Washington seems to have put a lot of effort into organizing the Tokyo Summit.
Over 40 trilateral meetings between the United States and its two allies, according to U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel, who believes that cooperation during this process helped to foster confidence.
The White House applauded the meeting between Kishida and Yoon.
Also, the United States will continue to help Japan and the ROK as they take steps to turn this new understanding into long-lasting progress, according to John Kirby, a spokesman for the WHNSC.
TO RESTORE TRADE TIES, SOUTH KOREA AND JAPAN ACHIEVE A DEAL
Before the Tokyo Summit even started, South Korea’s trade minister Lee Chang-yang announced that Japan had agreed to end its export restrictions on the country following discussions this week and that South Korea would withdraw its WTO complaint if the restrictions were lifted.
Japan and South Korea have long-standing disagreements about a group of islands, the Japanese colonisation of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945.
And atrocities committed during World War II, including forced exploitation of “comfort women” for Japanese soldiers.
When the South Korean Supreme Court ordered Japanese corporations to compensate Korean victims or grieving relatives in 2018, relations hit an all-time low. Shortly after, Japan placed economic penalties on South Korea.
The Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry stated that it had observed improvements in South Korea’s export regulations during the negotiations and that.
In response to Seoul’s decision to withdraw its WTO complaint, Japan had lifted its sanctions against South Korea and returned it to the pre-July 2019 situation.
Fluorinated polyimides, which are utilized in OLED panels for Televisions and smartphones, as well as photoresist and hydrogen fluoride, which are needed to make semiconductors, were all subject to Japanese export regulations.
The nations will keep talking on regaining each other’s favoured trading status, according to Lee’s ministry. According to Kishida, the two nations also decided to start having regular discussions about economic security.
Region in turmoil as Beijing and Washington compete for influence
The conference takes place amid a number of spectacular incidents that Kishida described as a “difficult security environment.”
Better relations between Japan and South Korea will be welcomed in Washington as the U.S. effort to fortify its alliances in Asia has been hampered by disputes over historical matters.
Thursday marked the start of coordinated anti-submarine warfare exercises between the three nations and Canada and India.
Just before Yoon left for Tokyo on Thursday morning, North Korea fired off a missile.
North Korea claimed on Friday that the largest joint military exercises between the United States and South Korea in years were the target of the intercontinental ballistic missile launch, which leader Kim Jong Un oversaw.
On Thursday, both China and Japan escalated their dispute over a small group of islands in the East China Sea by accusing the other of invading their maritime domain.
The conference comes after a string of Chinese diplomatic triumphs in areas that have historically been perceived as being more under US control.
As part of Beijing’s efforts to isolate the autonomously ruled island, Honduras declared on Wednesday that it would withdraw its diplomatic recognition of Taiwan in favour of China.
Last week, Saudi Arabia and Iran announced a surprising agreement to reestablish diplomatic ties, mediated by China.
BUSINESS TALKS AND DINNER FOLLOW THE TOKYO SUMMIT
After the Tokyo Summit, Kishida and Yoon had dinner and unofficial conversations, according to Kishida’s office.
Yoon’s favourite foods, “sukiyaki” beef stew and “omu-rice,” or rice topped with an omelette, were served as part of a two-part dinner hosted by Kishida.
The Japanese government published a photo of a group of leaders toasting each other with beers while grinning.
The Japanese mostly praised the meeting’s outcome as the start of their future cooperation.
“Japan and South Korea need to have their normalized relations contribute not only for themselves but for the benefit of the entire international society,” Japan’s largest newspaper Yomiuri wrote in an editorial Friday.
Yoon is criticised at home by those who feel he compromised too much, and a few individuals showed up at protests in Seoul to protest the deal.
Yoon attended a reception held by the Korean Residents’ Union in Japan after his arrival on Thursday.
Hundreds of thousands made a plea for stronger relationships of ethnic Korean inhabitants of Japan, many of whom were descended from those who were taken there against their will during the war.
On Thursday, Keidanren, or the Japan Business Federation, a significant Japanese business lobby, also declared that it and its South Korean counterpart had agreed to separately establish private funds for international initiatives, including youth exchanges.
Keidanren said they want to launch with an investment of 100 million yen ($752,420).
Yoon is traveling with twelve businessmen, and on Friday they will meet their Japanese counterparts.
RELATED CTN NEWS:
North Korea Claimed ICBM Launch Aimed To “strike fear into the adversaries”

News
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding, But Still Accounting 48% Search Revenue

Google is so closely associated with its key product that its name is a verb that signifies “search.” However, Google’s dominance in that sector is dwindling.
According to eMarketer, Google will lose control of the US search industry for the first time in decades next year.
Google will remain the dominant search player, accounting for 48% of American search advertising revenue. And, remarkably, Google is still increasing its sales in the field, despite being the dominating player in search since the early days of the George W. Bush administration. However, Amazon is growing at a quicker rate.
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding
Amazon will hold over a quarter of US search ad dollars next year, rising to 27% by 2026, while Google will fall even more, according to eMarketer.
The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the forecast.
Lest you think you’ll have to switch to Bing or Yahoo, this isn’t the end of Google or anything really near.
Google is the fourth-most valued public firm in the world. Its market worth is $2.1 trillion, trailing just Apple, Microsoft, and the AI chip darling Nvidia. It also maintains its dominance in other industries, such as display advertisements, where it dominates alongside Facebook’s parent firm Meta, and video ads on YouTube.
To put those “other” firms in context, each is worth more than Delta Air Lines’ total market value. So, yeah, Google is not going anywhere.
Nonetheless, Google faces numerous dangers to its operations, particularly from antitrust regulators.
On Monday, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that Google must open up its Google Play Store to competitors, dealing a significant blow to the firm in its long-running battle with Fortnite creator Epic Games. Google announced that it would appeal the verdict.
In August, a federal judge ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly on search. That verdict could lead to the dissolution of the company’s search operation. Another antitrust lawsuit filed last month accuses Google of abusing its dominance in the online advertising business.
Meanwhile, European regulators have compelled Google to follow tough new standards, which have resulted in multiple $1 billion-plus fines.

Pixa Bay
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding
On top of that, the marketplace is becoming more difficult on its own.
TikTok, the fastest-growing social network, is expanding into the search market. And Amazon has accomplished something few other digital titans have done to date: it has established a habit.
When you want to buy anything, you usually go to Amazon, not Google. Amazon then buys adverts to push companies’ products to the top of your search results, increasing sales and earning Amazon a greater portion of the revenue. According to eMarketer, it is expected to generate $27.8 billion in search revenue in the United States next year, trailing only Google’s $62.9 billion total.
And then there’s AI, the technology that (supposedly) will change everything.
Why search in stilted language for “kendall jenner why bad bunny breakup” or “police moving violation driver rights no stop sign” when you can just ask OpenAI’s ChatGPT, “What’s going on with Kendall Jenner and Bad Bunny?” in “I need help fighting a moving violation involving a stop sign that wasn’t visible.” Google is working on exactly this technology with its Gemini product, but its success is far from guaranteed, especially with Apple collaborating with OpenAI and other businesses rapidly joining the market.
A Google spokeswoman referred to a blog post from last week in which the company unveiled ads in its AI overviews (the AI-generated text that appears at the top of search results). It’s Google’s way of expressing its ability to profit on a changing marketplace while retaining its business, even as its consumers steadily transition to ask-and-answer AI and away from search.
Google has long used a single catchphrase to defend itself against opponents who claim it is a monopoly abusing its power: competition is only a click away. Until recently, that seemed comically obtuse. Really? We are going to switch to Bing? Or Duck Duck Go? Give me a break.
But today, it feels more like reality.
Google is in no danger of disappearing. However, every highly dominating company faces some type of reckoning over time. GE, a Dow mainstay for more than a century, was broken up last year and is now a shell of its previous dominance. Sears declared bankruptcy in 2022 and is virtually out of business. US Steel, long the foundation of American manufacturing, is attempting to sell itself to a Japanese corporation.
SOURCE | CNN
News
The Supreme Court Turns Down Biden’s Government Appeal in a Texas Emergency Abortion Matter.

(VOR News) – A ruling that prohibits emergency abortions that contravene the Supreme Court law in the state of Texas, which has one of the most stringent abortion restrictions in the country, has been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States. The United States Supreme Court upheld this decision.
The justices did not provide any specifics regarding the underlying reasons for their decision to uphold an order from a lower court that declared hospitals cannot be legally obligated to administer abortions if doing so would violate the law in the state of Texas.
Institutions are not required to perform abortions, as stipulated in the decree. The common populace did not investigate any opposing viewpoints. The decision was made just weeks before a presidential election that brought abortion to the forefront of the political agenda.
This decision follows the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that ended abortion nationwide.
In response to a request from the administration of Vice President Joe Biden to overturn the lower court’s decision, the justices expressed their disapproval.
The government contends that hospitals are obligated to perform abortions in compliance with federal legislation when the health or life of an expectant patient is in an exceedingly precarious condition.
This is the case in regions where the procedure is prohibited. The difficulty hospitals in Texas and other states are experiencing in determining whether or not routine care could be in violation of stringent state laws that prohibit abortion has resulted in an increase in the number of complaints concerning pregnant women who are experiencing medical distress being turned away from emergency rooms.
The administration cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in a case that bore a striking resemblance to the one that was presented to it in Idaho at the beginning of the year. The justices took a limited decision in that case to allow the continuation of emergency abortions without interruption while a lawsuit was still being heard.
In contrast, Texas has been a vocal proponent of the injunction’s continued enforcement. Texas has argued that its circumstances are distinct from those of Idaho, as the state does have an exemption for situations that pose a significant hazard to the health of an expectant patient.
According to the state, the discrepancy is the result of this exemption. The state of Idaho had a provision that safeguarded a woman’s life when the issue was first broached; however, it did not include protection for her health.
Certified medical practitioners are not obligated to wait until a woman’s life is in imminent peril before they are legally permitted to perform an abortion, as determined by the state supreme court.
The state of Texas highlighted this to the Supreme Court.
Nevertheless, medical professionals have criticized the Texas statute as being perilously ambiguous, and a medical board has declined to provide a list of all the disorders that are eligible for an exception. Furthermore, the statute has been criticized for its hazardous ambiguity.
For an extended period, termination of pregnancies has been a standard procedure in medical treatment for individuals who have been experiencing significant issues. It is implemented in this manner to prevent catastrophic outcomes, such as sepsis, organ failure, and other severe scenarios.
Nevertheless, medical professionals and hospitals in Texas and other states with strict abortion laws have noted that it is uncertain whether or not these terminations could be in violation of abortion prohibitions that include the possibility of a prison sentence. This is the case in regions where abortion prohibitions are exceedingly restrictive.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which resulted in restrictions on the rights of women to have abortions in several Republican-ruled states, the Texas case was revisited in 2022.
As per the orders that were disclosed by the administration of Vice President Joe Biden, hospitals are still required to provide abortions in cases that are classified as dire emergency.
As stipulated in a piece of health care legislation, the majority of hospitals are obligated to provide medical assistance to patients who are experiencing medical distress. This is in accordance with the law.
The state of Texas maintained that hospitals should not be obligated to provide abortions throughout the litigation, as doing so would violate the state’s constitutional prohibition on abortions. In its January judgment, the 5th United States Circuit Court of Appeals concurred with the state and acknowledged that the administration had exceeded its authority.
SOURCE: AP
SEE ALSO:
Could Last-Minute Surprises Derail Kamala Harris’ Campaign? “Nostradamus” Explains the US Poll.
News
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli, To repay $6.4 Million

Washington — The Supreme Court rejected Martin Shkreli’s appeal on Monday, after he was branded “Pharma Bro” for raising the price of a lifesaving prescription.
Martin appealed a decision to repay $64.6 million in profits he and his former company earned after monopolizing the pharmaceutical market and dramatically raising its price. His lawyers claimed the money went to his company rather than him personally.
The justices did not explain their reasoning, as is customary, and there were no notable dissents.
Prosecutors, conversely, claimed that the firm had promised to pay $40 million in a settlement and that because Martin orchestrated the plan, he should be held accountable for returning profits.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli
Martin was also forced to forfeit the Wu-Tang Clan’s unreleased album “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin,” which has been dubbed the world’s rarest musical album. The multiplatinum hip-hop group auctioned off a single copy of the record in 2015, stipulating that it not be used commercially.
Shkreli was convicted of lying to investors and defrauding them of millions of dollars in two unsuccessful hedge funds he managed. Shkreli was the CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals (later Vyera), which hiked the price of Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 per pill after acquiring exclusive rights to the decades-old medicine in 2015. It cures a rare parasite condition that affects pregnant women, cancer patients, and HIV patients.
He defended the choice as an example of capitalism in action, claiming that insurance and other programs ensured that those in need of Daraprim would eventually receive it. However, the move prompted criticism, from the medical community to Congress.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli
Attorney Thomas Huff said the Supreme Court’s Monday ruling was upsetting, but the high court could still overturn a lower court judgment that allowed the $64 million penalty order even though Shkreli had not personally received the money.
“If and when the Supreme Court does so, Mr. Shkreli will have a strong argument for modifying the order accordingly,” he told reporters.
Shkreli was freed from prison in 2022 after serving most of his seven-year sentence.
SOURCE | AP
-
News4 years ago
Let’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health4 years ago
How Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech2 years ago
Top Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles3 years ago
Aries Soulmate Signs
-
Movies2 years ago
What Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Health3 years ago
Can I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Learning3 years ago
Virtual Numbers: What Are They For?