Connect with us

News

Gaza Hospital Blast Claims Hundreds of Lives Amid Israeli Blockade’s Stranglehold on Medical Aid

gaza

(CTN NEWS) – Hamas is a multifaceted and controversial organization with complex designations by different countries and international bodies.

It operates as a political party and a militant group, and its status is subject to diverse interpretations based on the perspectives of various governments and organizations.

Hamas, whose full name is Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya (the Islamic Resistance Movement), was founded in 1987 during the First Intifada (Palestinian uprising) against Israeli occupation.

Initially, its primary focus was on resistance against Israeli forces in the occupied Palestinian territories, primarily in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Hamas’s military wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, is responsible for conducting armed activities, including attacks against Israeli military targets.

The organization’s founding charter, issued in 1988, contains anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rhetoric, calling for the destruction of Israel and the establishment of an Islamic state in historic Palestine.

This charter has drawn widespread condemnation, and some have characterized it as endorsing terrorism and violence.

It’s important to note that in recent years, there have been suggestions within Hamas for revising or reinterpreting the charter.

From a political perspective, Hamas has gained significant ground.

It won the Palestinian legislative elections in 2006 and subsequently took control of the Gaza Strip in a violent conflict with its rival Palestinian political party, Fatah, leading to a de facto split in Palestinian governance.

While Hamas governs the Gaza Strip, the West Bank is under the administration of the Palestinian Authority led by Fatah.

Hamas’s governance in Gaza has faced various challenges, including political isolation, economic difficulties, and recurring conflicts with Israel.

It is considered a terrorist organization by several countries, including Israel, the United States, Canada, the European Union, and others.

These designations are often rooted in concerns over the group’s militant activities, its refusal to recognize Israel, and its ties to Iran.

However, Hamas also enjoys support from certain countries and regions, particularly within the Middle East. Qatar and Turkey, for example, have maintained diplomatic relations with Hamas and provided financial assistance to the Gaza Strip.

From their perspective, Hamas is seen as a legitimate political force representing the Palestinian people’s resistance against Israeli occupation.

Efforts have been made over the years to mediate peace talks between Hamas and Israel, with mixed results.

Various ceasefires and agreements have been reached and subsequently broken, leading to recurring conflicts in the Gaza Strip.

In conclusion, Hamas is a complex and divisive organization, viewed differently by different actors on the global stage.

Its dual role as both a political entity and a militant group has made it a central player in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with a significant impact on the region’s stability and prospects for peace.

The humanitarian situation in Gaza is increasingly dire, with vital aid resources piling up at the closed border.

Diplomatic efforts have been underway to open a corridor from Egypt to facilitate aid delivery.

However, the United Nations and other officials are stressing the need for assurance of safe passage for potential aid convoys.

To address the escalating crisis, US President Joe Biden is embarking on an extraordinary wartime visit to Israel.

This visit follows Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s intensive efforts throughout the Middle East.

Initially, President Biden was set to attend a summit in Amman, Jordan, with several Arab leaders. However, the hospital blast in Gaza prompted the cancellation of the planned summit.

Instead, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas announced his intention to return to Ramallah for an urgent meeting of the Palestinian leadership.

The international community is increasingly concerned about the ongoing conflict, humanitarian hardships, and the urgent need for a peaceful resolution in the region.

The situation remains highly volatile, and diplomatic efforts are ongoing to address the complex challenges and bring about a lasting ceasefire.

The Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital, situated in the heart of Gaza City, was serving as a refuge for thousands of displaced individuals who had been forcibly evacuated from their homes due to the ongoing occupation, as reported by the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza.

Hamas, the governing authority in the region, has stated that over 500 people lost their lives in the bombing.

Initial estimates from the Palestinian Health Ministry had put the death toll at between 200 to 300 individuals.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in response to the situation, accused the “barbaric terrorists in Gaza” of “attacking” the hospital on Tuesday and remarked, “Whoever brutally took the lives of our children is also taking the lives of their children.”

Hospitals Under Siege

Over the course of more than a week, Israeli airstrikes have resulted in a devastating toll, with a reported death toll of over 3,000 individuals, including 1,032 girls and 940 boys, while 12,500 people have been wounded in Gaza, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health’s announcement on Tuesday.

Notably, the casualties in Gaza during the past ten days now exceed the total from the 51-day Gaza-Israel conflict in 2014.

Despite the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) claiming that they do not target hospitals, both the United Nations and Doctors Without Borders have reported instances of Israeli airstrikes hitting medical facilities, including hospitals and ambulances.

On the same Tuesday, Israeli warplanes struck two densely populated refugee camps and a UNRWA school housing displaced individuals in central Gaza, leading to the tragic death of at least 18 people and injuries to many, as confirmed by Palestinian officials.

The IDF also reported the elimination of a high-ranking Hamas commander, Ayman Nofal, in the airstrikes that took place in Gaza on that Tuesday.

In the occupied West Bank, the Palestinian Ministry of Health reported at least 61 fatalities as of Tuesday.

Additionally, the United Nations disclosed that at least 20 humanitarian workers from organizations such as the UN, the Red Cross, and the Red Crescent have lost their lives in Gaza.

Furthermore, the situation within Gaza is reaching a critical point, with healthcare services at the brink and dwindling supplies of food and water.

The UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) issued a warning, indicating that 20 out of 23 hospitals are only able to provide partial services due to nearly depleted fuel reserves.

UN agencies have issued a stark warning, indicating that shops in Gaza are perilously close to depleting their food supplies, with less than a week’s worth of stocks remaining.

Furthermore, Gaza’s sole seawater desalination plant has ceased operation, intensifying the risk of additional fatalities, dehydration, and waterborne diseases.

Hospitals in Gaza have been inundated with a significant influx of bodies originating from various locations in southern Gaza, as reported by Dr. Mohammad Zaqout, the director of Gaza hospitals.

This somber toll includes numerous victims of airstrikes in Rafah.

The Palestinian Interior Ministry has confirmed that Israeli airstrikes have resulted in the tragic loss of at least 49 lives in the southern Gaza cities of Rafah and Khan Younis.

In response, IDF spokesperson Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus informed CNN that he was “not aware of any strikes specifically in those areas but they could have happened.”

Closed Crossing

Urgent pleas for assistance are increasing on both sides of the border as aid resources accumulate on the Egyptian side of the crossing.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced on Tuesday that the United States and Israel have jointly committed to devising a plan that will facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid from donor nations and international organizations to the civilian population in Gaza.

Nevertheless, on the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing, a lengthy convoy of humanitarian aid remains queued up, eagerly waiting for authorization to enter Gaza, according to Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, who conveyed this to CNN.

He explained that, as of now, no secure passage has been granted for these convoys, lacking the necessary authorization or clearly marked and secure routes to ensure their safe entry without the risk of being targeted.

Furthermore, he noted that the Rafah crossing had been subjected to bombing on four occasions over the past few days.

Transporting humanitarian assistance to those in need in Gaza has become exceedingly challenging, given the frequent Israeli airstrikes targeting UN facilities in the region.

UN spokesperson Dujarric emphasized the necessity of safe passages for humanitarian workers and secure points for aid distribution.

However, recent Israeli strikes have made even the Rafah crossing, agreed upon for aid transfer with Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, unsafe for such operations.

In contrast, Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, insisted on restricting the entry of humanitarian aid until Hamas releases hostages, expressing a different perspective.

On the Gaza side, a substantial number of evacuees have gathered near the crossing, forming part of a widespread displacement that has resulted in over one million individuals fleeing their homes in just the past week, as reported by UNRWA.

Among these evacuees is a family of five Palestinian-Americans, all of whom are US citizens. They made the journey to Rafah on Monday, hopeful that the borders would be opened, only to be met with disappointment.

Haifa Kaoud, whose husband Hesham is one of the five individuals stuck in Gaza, shared their experience.

Satellite imagery provided by Maxar Technologies reveals four significant craters, each measuring 30 feet (9 meters) in diameter, obstructing the roadway near the border crossing closest to the Egyptian gate, alongside concrete slabs.

The United Nations Security Council rejected a Russian resolution on Monday, which called for a humanitarian ceasefire, as it did not receive enough votes.

Countries such as the US, the United Kingdom, and France voted against it because the resolution did not condemn Hamas for the October 7 attack, which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claimed resulted in the deaths of at least 1,400 people and the capture of numerous hostages.

Among the hostages is Mia Schem, a French-Israeli woman, who appeared in the initial hostage video released by Hamas. Her mother, Keren Scharf Schem, pleaded with world leaders to bring her daughter back home.

It’s important to note that CNN cannot independently verify the location, timing, or current condition of Mia Schem in the video.

Fears Of Regional Conflict

In the region, there are concerns among leaders about potential conflict between Israel and Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah to the north, as well as with Syria.

Border skirmishes have become a volatile flashpoint that could escalate into a wider conflict.

On Tuesday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reported gunfire directed at several locations along the security fence between Israel and Lebanon.

Simultaneously, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei issued a warning that if the “atrocities” against Gaza continue, there’s a risk that “Muslims and resistance forces could lose patience,” with potential consequences that nobody would be able to prevent.

Following an incursion by Hamas on October 7, militants from Lebanon fired shots that were intercepted by Israel, leading to a lethal exchange of fire.

Tragically, on Friday evening, an Israeli airstrike claimed the life of Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah, who hailed from southern Lebanon.

The attack also left at least six other reporters injured. CNN’s video analysis revealed that these journalists were wearing clearly marked press vests.

In further developments, on Tuesday, Israeli airstrikes in Alma al-Shaab, located in southern Lebanon, resulted in the loss of at least four lives, according to the Lebanese Red Cross.

Two Hezbollah fighters were reported to have been killed in clashes on the same day, although it remains uncertain whether they are included in the Red Cross’s reported death toll.

MORE RELATED NEWS:

Terror Strikes Sweden: Shocking Truth Behind Recent Attacks And Freedom Of Speech Debate

China’s Belt And Road Initiative (BRI) Adapts Towards Smaller And Greener Projects

U.S President Biden’s Solidarity Visit To Israel Amidst Humanitarian Crisis In Gaza

News

Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding, But Still Accounting 48% Search Revenue

Google

Google is so closely associated with its key product that its name is a verb that signifies “search.” However, Google’s dominance in that sector is dwindling.

According to eMarketer, Google will lose control of the US search industry for the first time in decades next year.

Google will remain the dominant search player, accounting for 48% of American search advertising revenue. And, remarkably, Google is still increasing its sales in the field, despite being the dominating player in search since the early days of the George W. Bush administration. However, Amazon is growing at a quicker rate.

google

Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding

Amazon will hold over a quarter of US search ad dollars next year, rising to 27% by 2026, while Google will fall even more, according to eMarketer.

The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the forecast.

Lest you think you’ll have to switch to Bing or Yahoo, this isn’t the end of Google or anything really near.

Google is the fourth-most valued public firm in the world. Its market worth is $2.1 trillion, trailing just Apple, Microsoft, and the AI chip darling Nvidia. It also maintains its dominance in other industries, such as display advertisements, where it dominates alongside Facebook’s parent firm Meta, and video ads on YouTube.

To put those “other” firms in context, each is worth more than Delta Air Lines’ total market value. So, yeah, Google is not going anywhere.

Nonetheless, Google faces numerous dangers to its operations, particularly from antitrust regulators.

On Monday, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that Google must open up its Google Play Store to competitors, dealing a significant blow to the firm in its long-running battle with Fortnite creator Epic Games. Google announced that it would appeal the verdict.

In August, a federal judge ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly on search. That verdict could lead to the dissolution of the company’s search operation. Another antitrust lawsuit filed last month accuses Google of abusing its dominance in the online advertising business.

Meanwhile, European regulators have compelled Google to follow tough new standards, which have resulted in multiple $1 billion-plus fines.

google

Pixa Bay

Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding

On top of that, the marketplace is becoming more difficult on its own.

TikTok, the fastest-growing social network, is expanding into the search market. And Amazon has accomplished something few other digital titans have done to date: it has established a habit.

When you want to buy anything, you usually go to Amazon, not Google. Amazon then buys adverts to push companies’ products to the top of your search results, increasing sales and earning Amazon a greater portion of the revenue. According to eMarketer, it is expected to generate $27.8 billion in search revenue in the United States next year, trailing only Google’s $62.9 billion total.

And then there’s AI, the technology that (supposedly) will change everything.

Why search in stilted language for “kendall jenner why bad bunny breakup” or “police moving violation driver rights no stop sign” when you can just ask OpenAI’s ChatGPT, “What’s going on with Kendall Jenner and Bad Bunny?” in “I need help fighting a moving violation involving a stop sign that wasn’t visible.” Google is working on exactly this technology with its Gemini product, but its success is far from guaranteed, especially with Apple collaborating with OpenAI and other businesses rapidly joining the market.

A Google spokeswoman referred to a blog post from last week in which the company unveiled ads in its AI overviews (the AI-generated text that appears at the top of search results). It’s Google’s way of expressing its ability to profit on a changing marketplace while retaining its business, even as its consumers steadily transition to ask-and-answer AI and away from search.

google

Google has long used a single catchphrase to defend itself against opponents who claim it is a monopoly abusing its power: competition is only a click away. Until recently, that seemed comically obtuse. Really? We are going to switch to Bing? Or Duck Duck Go? Give me a break.

But today, it feels more like reality.

Google is in no danger of disappearing. However, every highly dominating company faces some type of reckoning over time. GE, a Dow mainstay for more than a century, was broken up last year and is now a shell of its previous dominance. Sears declared bankruptcy in 2022 and is virtually out of business. US Steel, long the foundation of American manufacturing, is attempting to sell itself to a Japanese corporation.

Could we remember Google in the same way that we remember Yahoo or Ask Jeeves in decades? These next few years could be significant.

SOURCE | CNN

Continue Reading

News

2024 | Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

trump

Washington — Trump Media,  The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will not hear an appeal from social media platform X about a search warrant acquired by prosecutors in the election meddling case against former President Donald Trump.

The justices did not explain their rationale, and there were no recorded dissents.

The firm, which was known as Twitter before being purchased by billionaire Elon Musk, claims a nondisclosure order that prevented it from informing Trump about the warrant obtained by special counsel Jack Smith’s team violated its First Amendment rights.

The business also claims Trump should have had an opportunity to exercise executive privilege. If not reined in, the government may employ similar tactics to intercept additional privileged communications, their lawyers contended.

trump

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

Two neutral electronic privacy groups also joined in, urging the high court to hear the case on First Amendment grounds.

Prosecutors, however, claim that the corporation never shown that Trump utilized the account for official purposes, therefore executive privilege is not a problem. A lower court also determined that informing Trump could have compromised the current probe.

trump

Trump utilized his Twitter account in the weeks preceding up to his supporters’ attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, to spread false assertions about the election, which prosecutors claim were intended to create doubt in the democratic process.

The indictment describes how Trump used his Twitter account to encourage his followers to travel to Washington on Jan. 6, pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to reject the certification, and falsely claiming that the Capitol crowd, which battered police officers and destroyed glass, was peaceful.

musk trump

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

That case is now moving forward following the Supreme Court’s verdict in July, which granted Trump full immunity from criminal prosecution as a former president.

The warrant arrived at Twitter amid quick changes implemented by Musk, who bought the company in 2022 and has since cut off most of its workforce, including those dedicated to combating disinformation and hate speech.

He also welcomed back a vast list of previously banned users, including Trump, and endorsed him for the 2024 presidential election.

SOURCE | AP

Continue Reading

News

The Supreme Court Turns Down Biden’s Government Appeal in a Texas Emergency Abortion Matter.

Supreme Court

(VOR News) – A ruling that prohibits emergency abortions that contravene the Supreme Court law in the state of Texas, which has one of the most stringent abortion restrictions in the country, has been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States. The United States Supreme Court upheld this decision.

The justices did not provide any specifics regarding the underlying reasons for their decision to uphold an order from a lower court that declared hospitals cannot be legally obligated to administer abortions if doing so would violate the law in the state of Texas.

Institutions are not required to perform abortions, as stipulated in the decree. The common populace did not investigate any opposing viewpoints. The decision was made just weeks before a presidential election that brought abortion to the forefront of the political agenda.

This decision follows the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that ended abortion nationwide.

In response to a request from the administration of Vice President Joe Biden to overturn the lower court’s decision, the justices expressed their disapproval.

The government contends that hospitals are obligated to perform abortions in compliance with federal legislation when the health or life of an expectant patient is in an exceedingly precarious condition.

This is the case in regions where the procedure is prohibited. The difficulty hospitals in Texas and other states are experiencing in determining whether or not routine care could be in violation of stringent state laws that prohibit abortion has resulted in an increase in the number of complaints concerning pregnant women who are experiencing medical distress being turned away from emergency rooms.

The administration cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in a case that bore a striking resemblance to the one that was presented to it in Idaho at the beginning of the year. The justices took a limited decision in that case to allow the continuation of emergency abortions without interruption while a lawsuit was still being heard.

In contrast, Texas has been a vocal proponent of the injunction’s continued enforcement. Texas has argued that its circumstances are distinct from those of Idaho, as the state does have an exemption for situations that pose a significant hazard to the health of an expectant patient.

According to the state, the discrepancy is the result of this exemption. The state of Idaho had a provision that safeguarded a woman’s life when the issue was first broached; however, it did not include protection for her health.

Certified medical practitioners are not obligated to wait until a woman’s life is in imminent peril before they are legally permitted to perform an abortion, as determined by the state supreme court.

The state of Texas highlighted this to the Supreme Court.

Nevertheless, medical professionals have criticized the Texas statute as being perilously ambiguous, and a medical board has declined to provide a list of all the disorders that are eligible for an exception. Furthermore, the statute has been criticized for its hazardous ambiguity.

For an extended period, termination of pregnancies has been a standard procedure in medical treatment for individuals who have been experiencing significant issues. It is implemented in this manner to prevent catastrophic outcomes, such as sepsis, organ failure, and other severe scenarios.

Nevertheless, medical professionals and hospitals in Texas and other states with strict abortion laws have noted that it is uncertain whether or not these terminations could be in violation of abortion prohibitions that include the possibility of a prison sentence. This is the case in regions where abortion prohibitions are exceedingly restrictive.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which resulted in restrictions on the rights of women to have abortions in several Republican-ruled states, the Texas case was revisited in 2022.

As per the orders that were disclosed by the administration of Vice President Joe Biden, hospitals are still required to provide abortions in cases that are classified as dire emergency.

As stipulated in a piece of health care legislation, the majority of hospitals are obligated to provide medical assistance to patients who are experiencing medical distress. This is in accordance with the law.

The state of Texas maintained that hospitals should not be obligated to provide abortions throughout the litigation, as doing so would violate the state’s constitutional prohibition on abortions. In its January judgment, the 5th United States Circuit Court of Appeals concurred with the state and acknowledged that the administration had exceeded its authority.

SOURCE: AP

SEE ALSO:

Could Last-Minute Surprises Derail Kamala Harris’ Campaign? “Nostradamus” Explains the US Poll.

Scientists Awarded MicroRNA The Nobel Prize in Medicine.

US Inflation will Comfort a Fed Focused on Labor Markets.

Continue Reading

Trending