News
Joe Biden And Yoon To Sign An Agreement To Dock Nuclear Subs In S.Korea For 1st time In 40 years

(CTN News) – According to senior Biden administration officials, Presidents Joe Biden and Yoon Suk Yeol will sign an agreement on Wednesday that includes plans to have U.S. nuclear-armed submarines dock in South Korea for the first time in more than 40 years.
This will be a prominent demonstration of support for Seoul amid growing concerns about North Korea’s nuclear threats.
The upcoming dock visits are a crucial component of the “Washington Declaration,” which aims to dissuade North Korea from attacking its neighbour.
It is being introduced as Biden hosts Yoon on a state visit at a time when both leaders are feeling particularly anxious due to North Korea’s recent increase in the frequency of ballistic missile testing.
Prior to the official announcement, three senior Biden administration officials who briefed reporters on the plan said they had been working on the specifics for months and had come to the consensus that “occasional”.
And “very clear demonstrations of the strength” of American extended deterrence capabilities needed to be a crucial component of the agreement.
The deal aims to soothe South Korea’s concerns over the North’s aggressive nuclear weapons programme and prevent it from resuming its own nuclear program.
Which it abandoned when it ratified the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty nearly 50 years ago.
Yoon previously stated that his nation was debating whether to develop its own nuclear weapons or request that the United States relocate them to the Korean Peninsula.
However, operational control of such weapons would stay in U.S. control, and no nuclear weapons are being transported onto South Korean coastlines.
The U.S. and South Korea would also closely coordinate on a nuclear response strategy in the event that the North attacked the South.
Before their private talks on Wednesday morning, Biden and Yoon delivered statements during a pomp-filled arrival ceremony in front of close to 7,000 visitors on the White House lawn.
Joe Biden emphasized the determination of both countries to collaborate in order to maintain Indo-Pacific security
“We’re taking on the challenges of the world, and we’re taking them on together,” added Biden.
The state visit coincides with the 70th anniversary of the alliance between the United States and South Korea, which was established at the end of the Korean War and committed the United States to aid South Korea in self-defense, notably against North Korea.
Currently, there are 28,500 American soldiers stationed in South Korea.
Why did they risk their lives for this distant nation and for others you have never met? Yoon spoke about the American soldiers who fought in the conflict. “That was done for the defence of freedom, a noble cause.”
The agreement also mandates improved South Korean military asset integration into the combined strategic deterrence operation and strengthened collaborative training between the U.S. and South Korean forces.
According to the officials, as part of the proclamation, South Korea would reaffirm its adherence to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which was signed by a number of significant nuclear and non-nuclear powers and committed them to working together to prevent the spread of nuclear technology.
Yoon pledged as a presidential candidate last year that he would push for a larger deployment of American bombers, aircraft carriers.
And nuclear submarines to South Korea in an effort to respond to the North’s threats more forcefully than Moon Jae-in had.
According to the Federation of American Scientists, South Korean ports were frequently visited by American nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines during the height of the Cold War in the late 1970s, sometimes twice or three times per month.
It was a time when South Korea was home to a large number of American nuclear bombs.
But when the US withdrew all of its nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula in 1991, Pyongyang and Seoul agreed to a joint declaration promising not to “test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess, store, deploy or use nuclear weapons.”
However, as a result of the North’s persistent violations of the agreement over time, there is growing support in South Korea for the United States to hand over its nuclear arsenal.
One official in the Biden administration issued a warning, stating that it is “crystal clear” that the administration has no intentions of “returning tactical or any other kind of nuclear weapon to the Korean Peninsula.”
Instead, administration officials stated that they hope that the deployment of bombers or aircraft carriers by the U.S. military to South Korea will be more frequent after the visit of ballistic missile submarines.
The Biden administration has been compelled to broaden its Asian alliance as a result of North Korea’s rising nuclear threats and worries about China’s military and economic aggression in the area.
To that purpose, Biden has given Yoon and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida a lot of attention. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of the Philippines will meet with Biden in the Oval Office the following week.
North Korea has been rapidly increasing the size of its nuclear arsenal over the past year.
While China and Russia have consistently thwarted American efforts to impose more severe sanctions on the North due to its constant conduct of prohibited missile launches.
The first flight test of an intercontinental ballistic missile using solid fuel took place earlier this month as part of North Korea’s increased testing.
The most recent test is viewed as a potential advancement in the North’s pursuit of a more potent, more difficult-to-detect weapon aimed at the continental United States.
Along with nuclear deterrence, Biden, Yoon, and their assistants are anticipated to speak about Russia’s ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Although South Korea has received accolades from the Biden administration for contributing around $230 million in humanitarian aid to Kyiv.
Biden would welcome Seoul playing an even larger role in aiding the Ukrainians in their fight against Russia
Yoon’s visit takes place only a few weeks after the release of a large number of highly secret papers, which affected relations with allies like South Korea.
According to the documents seen by The Associated Press, the National Security Council of South Korea “grappled” with the American government in early March over the latter’s demand that Ukraine get artillery ammo.
According to the documents, which cited a signals intelligence report, the former NSC Director Kim Sung-han argued that since sending the 155 millimetre ammunition to Ukraine as soon as possible was the United States’ ultimate goal, it could be possible to sell the 330,000 rounds of ammunition to Poland.
According to a member of the Biden administration, Biden intended to speak with Yoon and inquire about “what it means for all like-minded allies to continue to support Ukraine” and “what the future of their support might look like.”
In addition to their discussions on Wednesday, Yoon and Biden will hold a joint news conference.
Yoon and his wife, Kim Keon Hee, will be honoured at a state dinner at the White House in the evening by Vice President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden.
RELATED CTN NEWS:
Thailand Has Reported 6 New Cases Involving The Omicron XBB.1.16 Subvariant

News
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding, But Still Accounting 48% Search Revenue

Google is so closely associated with its key product that its name is a verb that signifies “search.” However, Google’s dominance in that sector is dwindling.
According to eMarketer, Google will lose control of the US search industry for the first time in decades next year.
Google will remain the dominant search player, accounting for 48% of American search advertising revenue. And, remarkably, Google is still increasing its sales in the field, despite being the dominating player in search since the early days of the George W. Bush administration. However, Amazon is growing at a quicker rate.
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding
Amazon will hold over a quarter of US search ad dollars next year, rising to 27% by 2026, while Google will fall even more, according to eMarketer.
The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the forecast.
Lest you think you’ll have to switch to Bing or Yahoo, this isn’t the end of Google or anything really near.
Google is the fourth-most valued public firm in the world. Its market worth is $2.1 trillion, trailing just Apple, Microsoft, and the AI chip darling Nvidia. It also maintains its dominance in other industries, such as display advertisements, where it dominates alongside Facebook’s parent firm Meta, and video ads on YouTube.
To put those “other” firms in context, each is worth more than Delta Air Lines’ total market value. So, yeah, Google is not going anywhere.
Nonetheless, Google faces numerous dangers to its operations, particularly from antitrust regulators.
On Monday, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that Google must open up its Google Play Store to competitors, dealing a significant blow to the firm in its long-running battle with Fortnite creator Epic Games. Google announced that it would appeal the verdict.
In August, a federal judge ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly on search. That verdict could lead to the dissolution of the company’s search operation. Another antitrust lawsuit filed last month accuses Google of abusing its dominance in the online advertising business.
Meanwhile, European regulators have compelled Google to follow tough new standards, which have resulted in multiple $1 billion-plus fines.

Pixa Bay
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding
On top of that, the marketplace is becoming more difficult on its own.
TikTok, the fastest-growing social network, is expanding into the search market. And Amazon has accomplished something few other digital titans have done to date: it has established a habit.
When you want to buy anything, you usually go to Amazon, not Google. Amazon then buys adverts to push companies’ products to the top of your search results, increasing sales and earning Amazon a greater portion of the revenue. According to eMarketer, it is expected to generate $27.8 billion in search revenue in the United States next year, trailing only Google’s $62.9 billion total.
And then there’s AI, the technology that (supposedly) will change everything.
Why search in stilted language for “kendall jenner why bad bunny breakup” or “police moving violation driver rights no stop sign” when you can just ask OpenAI’s ChatGPT, “What’s going on with Kendall Jenner and Bad Bunny?” in “I need help fighting a moving violation involving a stop sign that wasn’t visible.” Google is working on exactly this technology with its Gemini product, but its success is far from guaranteed, especially with Apple collaborating with OpenAI and other businesses rapidly joining the market.
A Google spokeswoman referred to a blog post from last week in which the company unveiled ads in its AI overviews (the AI-generated text that appears at the top of search results). It’s Google’s way of expressing its ability to profit on a changing marketplace while retaining its business, even as its consumers steadily transition to ask-and-answer AI and away from search.
Google has long used a single catchphrase to defend itself against opponents who claim it is a monopoly abusing its power: competition is only a click away. Until recently, that seemed comically obtuse. Really? We are going to switch to Bing? Or Duck Duck Go? Give me a break.
But today, it feels more like reality.
Google is in no danger of disappearing. However, every highly dominating company faces some type of reckoning over time. GE, a Dow mainstay for more than a century, was broken up last year and is now a shell of its previous dominance. Sears declared bankruptcy in 2022 and is virtually out of business. US Steel, long the foundation of American manufacturing, is attempting to sell itself to a Japanese corporation.
SOURCE | CNN
News
The Supreme Court Turns Down Biden’s Government Appeal in a Texas Emergency Abortion Matter.

(VOR News) – A ruling that prohibits emergency abortions that contravene the Supreme Court law in the state of Texas, which has one of the most stringent abortion restrictions in the country, has been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States. The United States Supreme Court upheld this decision.
The justices did not provide any specifics regarding the underlying reasons for their decision to uphold an order from a lower court that declared hospitals cannot be legally obligated to administer abortions if doing so would violate the law in the state of Texas.
Institutions are not required to perform abortions, as stipulated in the decree. The common populace did not investigate any opposing viewpoints. The decision was made just weeks before a presidential election that brought abortion to the forefront of the political agenda.
This decision follows the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that ended abortion nationwide.
In response to a request from the administration of Vice President Joe Biden to overturn the lower court’s decision, the justices expressed their disapproval.
The government contends that hospitals are obligated to perform abortions in compliance with federal legislation when the health or life of an expectant patient is in an exceedingly precarious condition.
This is the case in regions where the procedure is prohibited. The difficulty hospitals in Texas and other states are experiencing in determining whether or not routine care could be in violation of stringent state laws that prohibit abortion has resulted in an increase in the number of complaints concerning pregnant women who are experiencing medical distress being turned away from emergency rooms.
The administration cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in a case that bore a striking resemblance to the one that was presented to it in Idaho at the beginning of the year. The justices took a limited decision in that case to allow the continuation of emergency abortions without interruption while a lawsuit was still being heard.
In contrast, Texas has been a vocal proponent of the injunction’s continued enforcement. Texas has argued that its circumstances are distinct from those of Idaho, as the state does have an exemption for situations that pose a significant hazard to the health of an expectant patient.
According to the state, the discrepancy is the result of this exemption. The state of Idaho had a provision that safeguarded a woman’s life when the issue was first broached; however, it did not include protection for her health.
Certified medical practitioners are not obligated to wait until a woman’s life is in imminent peril before they are legally permitted to perform an abortion, as determined by the state supreme court.
The state of Texas highlighted this to the Supreme Court.
Nevertheless, medical professionals have criticized the Texas statute as being perilously ambiguous, and a medical board has declined to provide a list of all the disorders that are eligible for an exception. Furthermore, the statute has been criticized for its hazardous ambiguity.
For an extended period, termination of pregnancies has been a standard procedure in medical treatment for individuals who have been experiencing significant issues. It is implemented in this manner to prevent catastrophic outcomes, such as sepsis, organ failure, and other severe scenarios.
Nevertheless, medical professionals and hospitals in Texas and other states with strict abortion laws have noted that it is uncertain whether or not these terminations could be in violation of abortion prohibitions that include the possibility of a prison sentence. This is the case in regions where abortion prohibitions are exceedingly restrictive.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which resulted in restrictions on the rights of women to have abortions in several Republican-ruled states, the Texas case was revisited in 2022.
As per the orders that were disclosed by the administration of Vice President Joe Biden, hospitals are still required to provide abortions in cases that are classified as dire emergency.
As stipulated in a piece of health care legislation, the majority of hospitals are obligated to provide medical assistance to patients who are experiencing medical distress. This is in accordance with the law.
The state of Texas maintained that hospitals should not be obligated to provide abortions throughout the litigation, as doing so would violate the state’s constitutional prohibition on abortions. In its January judgment, the 5th United States Circuit Court of Appeals concurred with the state and acknowledged that the administration had exceeded its authority.
SOURCE: AP
SEE ALSO:
Could Last-Minute Surprises Derail Kamala Harris’ Campaign? “Nostradamus” Explains the US Poll.
News
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli, To repay $6.4 Million

Washington — The Supreme Court rejected Martin Shkreli’s appeal on Monday, after he was branded “Pharma Bro” for raising the price of a lifesaving prescription.
Martin appealed a decision to repay $64.6 million in profits he and his former company earned after monopolizing the pharmaceutical market and dramatically raising its price. His lawyers claimed the money went to his company rather than him personally.
The justices did not explain their reasoning, as is customary, and there were no notable dissents.
Prosecutors, conversely, claimed that the firm had promised to pay $40 million in a settlement and that because Martin orchestrated the plan, he should be held accountable for returning profits.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli
Martin was also forced to forfeit the Wu-Tang Clan’s unreleased album “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin,” which has been dubbed the world’s rarest musical album. The multiplatinum hip-hop group auctioned off a single copy of the record in 2015, stipulating that it not be used commercially.
Shkreli was convicted of lying to investors and defrauding them of millions of dollars in two unsuccessful hedge funds he managed. Shkreli was the CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals (later Vyera), which hiked the price of Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 per pill after acquiring exclusive rights to the decades-old medicine in 2015. It cures a rare parasite condition that affects pregnant women, cancer patients, and HIV patients.
He defended the choice as an example of capitalism in action, claiming that insurance and other programs ensured that those in need of Daraprim would eventually receive it. However, the move prompted criticism, from the medical community to Congress.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli
Attorney Thomas Huff said the Supreme Court’s Monday ruling was upsetting, but the high court could still overturn a lower court judgment that allowed the $64 million penalty order even though Shkreli had not personally received the money.
“If and when the Supreme Court does so, Mr. Shkreli will have a strong argument for modifying the order accordingly,” he told reporters.
Shkreli was freed from prison in 2022 after serving most of his seven-year sentence.
SOURCE | AP
-
News4 years ago
Let’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health4 years ago
How Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech2 years ago
Top Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles3 years ago
Aries Soulmate Signs
-
Movies2 years ago
What Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Health3 years ago
Can I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Learning3 years ago
Virtual Numbers: What Are They For?