News
Thai Party Pushes to Legalize Gambling

Legalize Gambling: Some time ago, the Thai government launched a campaign against casinos. During that time, all local gambling venues were closed and shut down. The move was very upsetting for many of the country’s citizens.
The case on the ground
The government has a lot of control over gambling in Thailand. You’ll need to obtain a special license if you want to run the best online casino or any other type of gaming venue. However, things aren’t as strict when people decide to play with friends and family members at home. Many Thais enjoy a friendly game of poker or mahjong after dinner with their loved ones without ever worrying about a negative consequence from the authorities.
Even though there are no laws against gambling in Thailand, the government has very strong opinions about whether the country should legalize betting for recreational purposes or keep it banned for everyone there. There is also political tension around legalization: one side wants more control over gambling operations, and another wants less regulation.
The Kla Party has announced that it intends to promote the re-introduction of gambling in the country. This is not the first time attempts have been made to legalize gambling. A couple of months ago, another member of Parliament suggested the same idea. This politician was pretty confident that his proposal would be well-received by most people.
Another attempt to legalize gambling
An attempt to make gambling legal was attempted back in 2012. That politician was pretty confident that his proposal would be well-received by most people. He had plans to change gambling laws to legalize online and offline gaming. In addition, he wanted all lotteries and betting games authorized as well.
The bill did not pass due to some concerns being raised by other members of Parliament. One issue they brought up was how it could affect tourism if many more gamblers visited Thailand due to this initiative becoming law.
Another issue brought up by opponents was how gambling addiction could become worse if it were legal for people who do not have self-control regarding such matters.
Technically, gambling isn’t illegal in Thailand, but it’s still heavily frowned upon. While you can legally play lotteries and horse races, you have to have the right license and register with local authorities.
This is partly because many of these games are associated with gambling rings (wagering operations) that use underage gamblers and vulnerable individuals who cannot resist their manipulative tactics.
That doesn’t mean there aren’t isolated cases of people getting busted by authorities for playing these games at home or outside of casinos. They’ve been known to raid homes completely unannounced, just like when we won the lottery three years ago.
It was terrifying because we had no idea why our neighbor’s daughter was suddenly so interested in talking about it or how she’d found out about our lottery tickets (the answer? A friend told her).
There were just a ton-and-a-half of cops at my door, all insisting on taking me away for questioning and confiscating all documents related to my lottery winnings—because I wasn’t registered as a player!
The way things work now, if you want a license to gamble legally, you must be an accredited member in good standing of one of the Thais’ many casinos located within high-end hotels exclusively intended for such purposes.
Of course, this is hardly convenient for everyday citizens who wish to enjoy regular casino nights with their friends—but it’s not like anyone could expect otherwise.
What Could Happen If Gambling Is Legalized?
If you’ve ever visited Thailand, you know that shadow gambling is a way of life there. Long-term visitors might even catch up in the national addiction, especially if they visit the country frequently.
There isn’t a lot to do in major cities like Bangkok and Chiang Mai, and for locals looking for cheap entertainment, spending money on lottery tickets or placing a few bets online is normal behavior. After legalization, the industry will potentially open up to more casino providers.
Online gaming is illegal in Thailand, but that doesn’t mean you can’t play any games online. With the right strategy, you can avoid the pitfalls of playing at local casinos and enjoy playing your favorite games from home.
VPN
VPN stands for Virtual Private Network, and it’s a tool that you can use to surf the internet anonymously. When you connect to a VPN, your traffic is encrypted and routed through a remote server in a different country, making it very difficult for anyone monitoring your connection to see what you’re doing online.
Foreign sportsbook betting sites
There is plenty of foreign sportsbook betting sites that accept Thai customers, but many won’t accept deposits or withdrawals from Thailand. Some will allow you to sign up and download their software from their website if you want to bet on sports with your mobile phone or tablet device (smartphone or tablet).
However, most of them will only let you withdraw money back into your Thai bank account after making at least one successful deposit into your account using international payment methods such as PayPal and Skrill/Moneybookers (Moneybookers is part of Neteller).
Foreign lottery sites
The lottery is illegal in Thailand, and the government has banned all forms of gambling, including lotteries, casino games, and sports betting. The only legal way to play the lotto is by buying a ticket from a licensed retailer. However, many foreign lottery sites allow you to play your favorite game online.
These sites are usually based in countries where online gambling is legal or tolerated, so they can operate without fear of being shut down by their respective governments.
The best thing about these sites is that you don’t have to worry about language barriers or currency exchange rates because everything happens in English, making it easy for everyone to participate regardless of their native language or location.
Offshore online poker sites
Many offshore online poker sites cater to players from Thailand. These sites have avoided the law by moving their servers overseas. They also offer a wide range of live dealer games and tournaments.
You will have to pay more for these services because they have to charge extra for the increased hosting costs. Also, there may be some restrictions on withdrawals and deposits as well.
People Also Read:
Sony PlayStation 5 Restock Today: How To Pre-Order PS 5 Via ShopAtSC
Need For Speed Mobile’s Leaked Video Surfaces Online, 3 Cars, Maps & More

News
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding, But Still Accounting 48% Search Revenue

Google is so closely associated with its key product that its name is a verb that signifies “search.” However, Google’s dominance in that sector is dwindling.
According to eMarketer, Google will lose control of the US search industry for the first time in decades next year.
Google will remain the dominant search player, accounting for 48% of American search advertising revenue. And, remarkably, Google is still increasing its sales in the field, despite being the dominating player in search since the early days of the George W. Bush administration. However, Amazon is growing at a quicker rate.
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding
Amazon will hold over a quarter of US search ad dollars next year, rising to 27% by 2026, while Google will fall even more, according to eMarketer.
The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the forecast.
Lest you think you’ll have to switch to Bing or Yahoo, this isn’t the end of Google or anything really near.
Google is the fourth-most valued public firm in the world. Its market worth is $2.1 trillion, trailing just Apple, Microsoft, and the AI chip darling Nvidia. It also maintains its dominance in other industries, such as display advertisements, where it dominates alongside Facebook’s parent firm Meta, and video ads on YouTube.
To put those “other” firms in context, each is worth more than Delta Air Lines’ total market value. So, yeah, Google is not going anywhere.
Nonetheless, Google faces numerous dangers to its operations, particularly from antitrust regulators.
On Monday, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that Google must open up its Google Play Store to competitors, dealing a significant blow to the firm in its long-running battle with Fortnite creator Epic Games. Google announced that it would appeal the verdict.
In August, a federal judge ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly on search. That verdict could lead to the dissolution of the company’s search operation. Another antitrust lawsuit filed last month accuses Google of abusing its dominance in the online advertising business.
Meanwhile, European regulators have compelled Google to follow tough new standards, which have resulted in multiple $1 billion-plus fines.

Pixa Bay
Google’s Search Dominance Is Unwinding
On top of that, the marketplace is becoming more difficult on its own.
TikTok, the fastest-growing social network, is expanding into the search market. And Amazon has accomplished something few other digital titans have done to date: it has established a habit.
When you want to buy anything, you usually go to Amazon, not Google. Amazon then buys adverts to push companies’ products to the top of your search results, increasing sales and earning Amazon a greater portion of the revenue. According to eMarketer, it is expected to generate $27.8 billion in search revenue in the United States next year, trailing only Google’s $62.9 billion total.
And then there’s AI, the technology that (supposedly) will change everything.
Why search in stilted language for “kendall jenner why bad bunny breakup” or “police moving violation driver rights no stop sign” when you can just ask OpenAI’s ChatGPT, “What’s going on with Kendall Jenner and Bad Bunny?” in “I need help fighting a moving violation involving a stop sign that wasn’t visible.” Google is working on exactly this technology with its Gemini product, but its success is far from guaranteed, especially with Apple collaborating with OpenAI and other businesses rapidly joining the market.
A Google spokeswoman referred to a blog post from last week in which the company unveiled ads in its AI overviews (the AI-generated text that appears at the top of search results). It’s Google’s way of expressing its ability to profit on a changing marketplace while retaining its business, even as its consumers steadily transition to ask-and-answer AI and away from search.
Google has long used a single catchphrase to defend itself against opponents who claim it is a monopoly abusing its power: competition is only a click away. Until recently, that seemed comically obtuse. Really? We are going to switch to Bing? Or Duck Duck Go? Give me a break.
But today, it feels more like reality.
Google is in no danger of disappearing. However, every highly dominating company faces some type of reckoning over time. GE, a Dow mainstay for more than a century, was broken up last year and is now a shell of its previous dominance. Sears declared bankruptcy in 2022 and is virtually out of business. US Steel, long the foundation of American manufacturing, is attempting to sell itself to a Japanese corporation.
SOURCE | CNN
News
The Supreme Court Turns Down Biden’s Government Appeal in a Texas Emergency Abortion Matter.

(VOR News) – A ruling that prohibits emergency abortions that contravene the Supreme Court law in the state of Texas, which has one of the most stringent abortion restrictions in the country, has been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States. The United States Supreme Court upheld this decision.
The justices did not provide any specifics regarding the underlying reasons for their decision to uphold an order from a lower court that declared hospitals cannot be legally obligated to administer abortions if doing so would violate the law in the state of Texas.
Institutions are not required to perform abortions, as stipulated in the decree. The common populace did not investigate any opposing viewpoints. The decision was made just weeks before a presidential election that brought abortion to the forefront of the political agenda.
This decision follows the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that ended abortion nationwide.
In response to a request from the administration of Vice President Joe Biden to overturn the lower court’s decision, the justices expressed their disapproval.
The government contends that hospitals are obligated to perform abortions in compliance with federal legislation when the health or life of an expectant patient is in an exceedingly precarious condition.
This is the case in regions where the procedure is prohibited. The difficulty hospitals in Texas and other states are experiencing in determining whether or not routine care could be in violation of stringent state laws that prohibit abortion has resulted in an increase in the number of complaints concerning pregnant women who are experiencing medical distress being turned away from emergency rooms.
The administration cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in a case that bore a striking resemblance to the one that was presented to it in Idaho at the beginning of the year. The justices took a limited decision in that case to allow the continuation of emergency abortions without interruption while a lawsuit was still being heard.
In contrast, Texas has been a vocal proponent of the injunction’s continued enforcement. Texas has argued that its circumstances are distinct from those of Idaho, as the state does have an exemption for situations that pose a significant hazard to the health of an expectant patient.
According to the state, the discrepancy is the result of this exemption. The state of Idaho had a provision that safeguarded a woman’s life when the issue was first broached; however, it did not include protection for her health.
Certified medical practitioners are not obligated to wait until a woman’s life is in imminent peril before they are legally permitted to perform an abortion, as determined by the state supreme court.
The state of Texas highlighted this to the Supreme Court.
Nevertheless, medical professionals have criticized the Texas statute as being perilously ambiguous, and a medical board has declined to provide a list of all the disorders that are eligible for an exception. Furthermore, the statute has been criticized for its hazardous ambiguity.
For an extended period, termination of pregnancies has been a standard procedure in medical treatment for individuals who have been experiencing significant issues. It is implemented in this manner to prevent catastrophic outcomes, such as sepsis, organ failure, and other severe scenarios.
Nevertheless, medical professionals and hospitals in Texas and other states with strict abortion laws have noted that it is uncertain whether or not these terminations could be in violation of abortion prohibitions that include the possibility of a prison sentence. This is the case in regions where abortion prohibitions are exceedingly restrictive.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which resulted in restrictions on the rights of women to have abortions in several Republican-ruled states, the Texas case was revisited in 2022.
As per the orders that were disclosed by the administration of Vice President Joe Biden, hospitals are still required to provide abortions in cases that are classified as dire emergency.
As stipulated in a piece of health care legislation, the majority of hospitals are obligated to provide medical assistance to patients who are experiencing medical distress. This is in accordance with the law.
The state of Texas maintained that hospitals should not be obligated to provide abortions throughout the litigation, as doing so would violate the state’s constitutional prohibition on abortions. In its January judgment, the 5th United States Circuit Court of Appeals concurred with the state and acknowledged that the administration had exceeded its authority.
SOURCE: AP
SEE ALSO:
Could Last-Minute Surprises Derail Kamala Harris’ Campaign? “Nostradamus” Explains the US Poll.
News
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli, To repay $6.4 Million

Washington — The Supreme Court rejected Martin Shkreli’s appeal on Monday, after he was branded “Pharma Bro” for raising the price of a lifesaving prescription.
Martin appealed a decision to repay $64.6 million in profits he and his former company earned after monopolizing the pharmaceutical market and dramatically raising its price. His lawyers claimed the money went to his company rather than him personally.
The justices did not explain their reasoning, as is customary, and there were no notable dissents.
Prosecutors, conversely, claimed that the firm had promised to pay $40 million in a settlement and that because Martin orchestrated the plan, he should be held accountable for returning profits.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli
Martin was also forced to forfeit the Wu-Tang Clan’s unreleased album “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin,” which has been dubbed the world’s rarest musical album. The multiplatinum hip-hop group auctioned off a single copy of the record in 2015, stipulating that it not be used commercially.
Shkreli was convicted of lying to investors and defrauding them of millions of dollars in two unsuccessful hedge funds he managed. Shkreli was the CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals (later Vyera), which hiked the price of Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 per pill after acquiring exclusive rights to the decades-old medicine in 2015. It cures a rare parasite condition that affects pregnant women, cancer patients, and HIV patients.
He defended the choice as an example of capitalism in action, claiming that insurance and other programs ensured that those in need of Daraprim would eventually receive it. However, the move prompted criticism, from the medical community to Congress.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli
Attorney Thomas Huff said the Supreme Court’s Monday ruling was upsetting, but the high court could still overturn a lower court judgment that allowed the $64 million penalty order even though Shkreli had not personally received the money.
“If and when the Supreme Court does so, Mr. Shkreli will have a strong argument for modifying the order accordingly,” he told reporters.
Shkreli was freed from prison in 2022 after serving most of his seven-year sentence.
SOURCE | AP
-
News4 years ago
Let’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health4 years ago
How Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech2 years ago
Top Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles3 years ago
Aries Soulmate Signs
-
Movies3 years ago
What Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Health3 years ago
Can I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Learning3 years ago
Virtual Numbers: What Are They For?