Politics

China Calls the United States an Nation of Lies and Misinformation

China’s foreign ministry has blasted the United States as the actual “nation of lies” on Saturday in response to a State Department study that said Beijing spent billions of dollars per year on information manipulation.

On Thursday, the U.S. State Department released a report detailing China’s efforts to influence international media through a combination of censorship, data collecting, and the clandestine purchase of foreign news outlets.

Produced in response to a congressional requirement to describe state information manipulation, the report found that Beijing had suffered “major setbacks” when targeting democratic countries, due to pushback from local media and civil society.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement calling the story “false information” for its omission of relevant data.

According to the Chinese ministry, the U.S. State Department bureaus responsible for the report “were the source of false information and the command post of ‘cognitive warfare.'”

Further, “facts have repeatedly proven that the United States is the true ’empire of lies,'” it said.

This study from the United States comes at a time of heightened criticism around Chinese efforts in recent years to expand the reach of its state-controlled media abroad. Beijing is making an effort to counter what it sees as unfairly bad media coverage of China around the world.

China’s America Problem

More and more Chinese see the United States as a tyrant that constantly insults their dignity, downplays their achievements, violates their sovereignty, and works to slow the expansion of China’s global power.

The American government’s perceived superiority, arrogance, “obsession” with liberty and democracy, and, most of all, missionary fervor to overthrow the communist dictatorship in China have all contributed to stoking feelings ranging from outrage to wrath.

In an effort to deflect international criticism, many in Washington have blamed the Chinese government of stoking anti-American sentiment at home. While the Chinese government certainly has a hand in shaping public opinion about the United States through its control of the country’s media, from TV to radio to newspapers to the internet, this view of America is hardly a product of Beijing.

They have real-world origins, being the result of ongoing tensions between China and the United States, a rise in Chinese nationalism, and other developments in Chinese society after 1989.

The ongoing, difficult battles between the Chinese government and the United States since 1989 have formed the public’s anti-American mindset. Many Chinese believe the United States intends to coerce China’s internal developments or reduce China’s worldwide influence due to disagreements in a wide variety of policy areas, including trade, human rights, weapons proliferation, and Taiwan.

Even while the Chinese government bears the brunt of the blame for stoking anti-American sentiment in the country, the average Chinese citizen dutifully toes the party line even when presented with counterarguments.

Chinese Nationalism

Even “Americanized” Chinese who have been exposed to American business training, American media sources, American education, and other parts of the American way of life hold negative views of the United States. Many English-speaking, ambitious, sophisticated, young Chinese professionals, entrepreneurs, and college students, although having seen American impacts firsthand, find the U.S. government and U.S. rhetoric repugnant.

Despite having limited access to state-controlled media, Chinese students in the United States continue to parrot official government talking points. Students who doubt the dissidents’ patriotism and criticise their character because they have challenged the authority of the Chinese communist regime are a common source of antagonism for the dissidents living in exile in the United States.

New York-based Human Rights in China Executive Director Xiao Qiang said that overseas Chinese students have called his work to hold China accountable for its persecution “harmful” to the Chinese people and “disloyal” to the Chinese nation.

Similarly, Chinese citizens who have access to Western media outlets that are critical of the Chinese government may not always embrace these outlets. Voice of America (VOA) distributes news and commentary into China from the United States, and a presenter for VOA says that the network has gotten countless reactions from Chinese listeners accusing it of “anti-China” bias in recent years.

A public relations manager in southern China referred to CNN as a “vehicle of American propaganda” despite the fact that the network is becoming increasingly well-known among Chinese business experts. It appears that Chinese citizens are just as responsible for shaping their own negative views of the United States as the state media.

As the legitimacy of the Chinese government rose, so did rising levels of Chinese nationalism and a pessimistic view of the United States. In part, this is the consequence of the government’s efforts to foster a sense of optimism about the future of China in light of the fact that the country’s official communist ideology is being eroded by market capitalism over the previous two decades.

Despite what many Americans may assume, a large portion of Chinese citizens, especially those who have benefited from the country’s changes over the past two decades, express satisfaction with and even pride in their government. Tracy Li believes China’s government are making strides to improve people’s quality of life by addressing these issues, and she agrees. We don’t care if the Americans don’t like it, and many Chinese do.

While many Americans believe the Chinese government has avoided political reforms in favour of economic ones, Minxin Pei of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace considers this belief a “prevailing myth.”

Although the political shifts made were not democratically progressive, they were crucial in establishing a more progressive economy and accountable governance.

Politics

U.N. Special Rapporteur Calls on Thailand’s Banks to Cut-Off Myanmar Junta

UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar Tom Andrews speaks during a press conference after a meeting with Thailand's Parliamentary Committee

The U.N special rapporteur for human rights in Myanmar has said the Bank of Thailand, commercial banks, and the anti-money laundering office are working on measures to stop the Myanmar Junta from acquiring weapons through Thailand’s banking system.

Tom Andrews the U.N. special rapporteur for human rights in Myanmar, said that some banks commercial in Thailand had aided Myanmar Junta’s by facilitating transactions that supplied military equipment to the Junta through the international banking system.

He called on the Bank of Thailand and financial institutions to do more to stop Myanmar’s junta acquiring weapons which they use on civilians to maintain power.

The special rapporteur was in Bangkok to address a parliamentary committee on security, he called on the Thai government to stop financial transactions that help supply weapons to Myanmar’s junta in line with a plan promoted by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) that sets out an end to violence as a first step toward peace.

In his 2023 report “The Billion Dollar Death Trade,” Andrews noted that Singapore had implemented a clear policy opposing the transfer of weapons to Myanmar.

Thai Baht – File Image

Thailand’s Banks Lacked Clear Policy

As a result, exports of weapons and related materials from Singapore-registered entities using the formal banking system dropped from almost U.S. $120 million in fiscal year 2022 to just over $10 million over the next 12 months.

However, he said Thailand had no explicit policy position opposing weapons transfer to the Myanmar Junta, which saw exports from Thai-registered entities more than double in 2023, from just over $60 million to nearly $130 million.

He called on Thai Government to conduct a thorough investigation into transfers as Singapore had done into its companies’ dealings.

Andrews told the the committee that five Thai commercial banks and Thai-based companies were assisting Myanmar’s junta obtain weapons, dual-technology items and jet fuel, enabling Military Junta to conduct atrocities against the people.

But said he had found no evidence that the Thai government was involved or was aware of the transactions or that Thai commercial banks had knowledge.

Photo courtesy of The Nation

Banks Condemn Myanmar Junta Violence

Meanwhile representatives from Thailand’s central bank, anti-money laundering office and the commercial banks named in the report were also present at the parliamentary meeting at government house in Bangkok.

A representative of the Bank of Thailand said officials were working with the commercial banks and the anti-money laundering office to make sure that enhanced oversight was properly practiced.

The Thai Bankers Association that was also at the parliamentary meeting said it did not have the means to investigate and monitor such irregularities beyond Thailand’s borders.

Mr. Pongsit Chaichatpornsuk, a Thai Bankers Association representative told the committee that If government security agencies tell us, we will stop transactions. We don’t support arms procurement by Myanmar Junta or any military government to violate human rights.

Thailand, which shares a long border with Myanmar and hosts many thousands of refugees fleeing conflict there, has tried to promote dialogue between Myanmar’s military rulers and opposition forces but no progress has been made.

This Article was first published in RFA

Politics

People Rushing Sign Online Petition to Impeach South Korea’s President Crash Site

The Speaker of the National Assembly of South Korea said in a statement that an online petition calling for South Korea’s President Mr. Yoon Suk-yeol’s impeachment crashed due to the enormous number of individuals attempting to sign the petition. Saying the National Assembly would resolve the matter as quickly as possible.

Since the petition was launch on the National Assembly’s website on June 20, more than 811,000 people have signed it. The petition urges Parliament to introduce legislation to impeach President Yoon on the grounds that he is unfit for office.

Late on June 30, National Assembly Speaker Mr. Woo Won-shik issued an apology for the disturbance and stated that Parliament would take action to protect the public’s fundamental rights.

People attempting to access the petition on July 1 experienced delays of up to four hours. At one point, an error message indicated that more than 30,000 individuals were waiting to access the site.

South Korea’s Parliament Hesitant

The online petition accuses Yoon of corruption, escalating the risk of conflict with North Korea, and endangering South Koreans’ health by failing to prevent Japan from leaking treated radioactive water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear power plant.

By law, Parliament must assign every petition signed by more than 50,000 people to a committee, which will then decide whether to put it to a vote in the assembly.

However, the opposition Democratic Party, which has a majority in Parliament, is hesitant to turn the petition into an impeachment bill, according to media reports, with a spokesperson stating that the party has yet to address the topic.

The Parliament can impeach a president with a two-thirds majority. The Constitutional Court then deliberates the motion and decides whether to remove or reinstall the president.

Meanwhile, on Monday Reuters reported North Korea criticized a joint military exercise performed this month by South Korea, Japan, and the United States, according to official media, saying such drills demonstrate the three nations’ alliance has evolved into “the Asian version of NATO”.

On Thursday, the three countries began large-scale combined military drills named “Freedom Edge” featuring navy destroyers, fighter fighters, and the nuclear-powered US aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, with the goal of strengthening defenses against missiles, submarines, and air strikes.

The drill was designed at a three-way meeting at Camp David last year to boost military cooperation amid concerns on the Korean peninsula caused by North Korea’s weapons testing.

Pyongyang will not overlook the strengthening of a military bloc led by the United States and its allies, and it would respond aggressively and decisively to defend regional peace, according to North Korea’s foreign ministry, as reported by KCNA.

Politics

Joe Biden Assures Donors He Can Still Win Presidential Election Despite Debate Concerns

(CTN News) – US President Joe Biden has convinced Democratic donors that he can still defeat Donald Trump in the November presidential election, following a dismal debate performance that raised concerns about his prospects.

On Saturday, the 81-year-old president attended a series of fundraising events in New York and New Jersey, defending his performance in CNN’s Presidential Debate.

On Thursday, Joe Biden conceded, “I didn’t have a great night, but neither did Trump” at one event.

“I promise you we’re going to win this election,” the politician declared.

Joe Biden’s debate performance was marked by difficult-to-follow and wobbly responses, generating further concerns among some Democrats about whether he is the ideal candidate to run in this high-stakes race.

Former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Joe Biden’s debate performance “wasn’t great,” while his former communications director, Kate Bedingfield, termed it “very disappointing.”

The president acknowledged the worry but committed to fighting harder.

New Jersey’s Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, attended the fundraiser alongside Mr. Biden and the First Lady, telling Mr. Biden, “We are all with you 1,000 percent.”

The Joe Biden team acknowledged that the debate did not go as planned but maintained he would not step aside for another nominee.

On Saturday, campaign chairwoman Jennifer O’Malley Dillon stated that internal post-debate polling revealed that “voters’ opinions were not changed”.

“It will not be the first time that overblown media narratives have driven temporary dips in the polls,” she told reporters.

Former President Barack Obama, a friend of Mr. Biden, admitted on social media that “bad debate nights happen”.

“This election is still a choice between someone who fought for ordinary folks his entire life and someone who only cares about himself,” said Mr. Obama.

Hours later, Mr Trump told his supporters that he saw the discussion as a “big victory” for his campaign.

“Joe Biden’s problem is not his age,” Trump, 78, added. “It is his competence. He’s quite incompetent.

Politicians were not the only ones who criticized Mr Biden’s performance.

A prominent editorial in the New York Times condemned his decision to run again as a “reckless gamble” and advised him to conduct some soul-searching this weekend.

It urged Democrats to “acknowledge that Joe Biden can’t continue his race and create a process to select someone more capable to stand in his place” .

Voters in the US have expressed misgivings about voting for any candidate after Thursday’s debate.

Lori Gregory, a long-time Democrat, told the BBC she “could not handle” watching the discussion, asking, “Is this the best our country can do?”

Republican Crystal Myers-Barber said it was “painful to watch,” but she also thought “Trump came across very level-headed and presidential, and Biden came across very weak.”

Democrat Shana Ziolko said she was “frustrated” by the debate and believed there was no obvious winner.

A post-debate poll conducted by liberal pollster Data for Progress revealed that 62% of potential voters who saw or read about the debate believed Trump won. Only 30% of those polled believed Mr Biden had won the debate.

Until more polling is done, fundraising could be another indicator of Joe Biden’s sustained popularity.

In a memo, chairwoman Jennifer O’Malley Dillon stated that the campaign had raised more than $27 million (£21.3 million) between the Thursday debate and Friday evening.

“After Thursday night’s debate, the Beltway class is counting Joe Biden out. “The data in battleground states, however, tells a different story,” she explained.

“This election was incredibly close before Thursday, and by every metric we’ve seen since, it remains just as close” , she commented.

Source: BBC